The following blog from National Review Online is the best article we've seen lately to explain the Palin Attack Machine. Read and Enjoy!
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDE3MmE5MDVmMGM1YjQ2NmVhMjJkN2I2ZTcxMzhlNjU=&w=MA==
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Friday, November 14, 2008
Now what...
There is little doubt that the Republican ticket had tremendous obstacles to overcome in the recent election and it is with great sorrow that the keepers of this site post today's response to the Democrat successes.
We've listened to the pundits, commentators, bull shooters, and straight shooters and have drawn our own conclusions.
This morning, we find that our conclusions are basically summed up by an article posted on Town Hall's website written by Burt Prelutsky. And, since we probably couldn't have stated it more eloquently, here is the link:
http://townhall.com/columnists/BurtPrelutsky/2008/11/14/mourning_in_america?page=1
Please take time to read it in its entirety. It will explain our recent silence here at this blog (we are in mourning) as well as our stand on all things American, and to us, sacred about the land we love.
We will continue to post on this site primarily for the sake of those who, like us, love the USA and continue to have hope that an awakening and realization will come that will bring the kind of change that really IS needed.
We've listened to the pundits, commentators, bull shooters, and straight shooters and have drawn our own conclusions.
This morning, we find that our conclusions are basically summed up by an article posted on Town Hall's website written by Burt Prelutsky. And, since we probably couldn't have stated it more eloquently, here is the link:
http://townhall.com/columnists/BurtPrelutsky/2008/11/14/mourning_in_america?page=1
Please take time to read it in its entirety. It will explain our recent silence here at this blog (we are in mourning) as well as our stand on all things American, and to us, sacred about the land we love.
We will continue to post on this site primarily for the sake of those who, like us, love the USA and continue to have hope that an awakening and realization will come that will bring the kind of change that really IS needed.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
WHAT IS AT STAKE
Not wanting to be those who post gloom and doom messages, we cannot ignore what is at stake in this election. In this blog we will expound on the reasons to support the McCain-Palin ticket. They are all equally important to us but we must start somewhere. So today's topic is our military and national defense.
At the end of this blog will be a link where you can watch Obama confirm the contents of this blog with his own mouth.
In October of 2007, Obama outlined his plan for our National Defense under an Obama administration. Following are the highlights:
1) He will end the war and withdraw troops immediately. (White flag of surrender, anyone?)
2) He will cut "tens of billions of dollars" in what he calls "wasteful" defense spending, including the spending on the Iraq war.
3) He will cut investment in missile defense systems.
4) He will NOT weaponize space (i.e. end spending on Star Wars, which is making great progress).
5) He will slow the development of future combat systems.
6) He will institute an independent defense priorities board to reign in "unnecessary" spending.
7) He will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons.
a. He will not develop new nuclear weapons
b. He will seek a ban on all fissile material
c. He will negotiate with RUSSIA to take our ICBMs off hair trigger alert and to achieve deep
cuts in our nuclear arsenals.
8) His SOLE priority in defense spending will be protecting America.
9) Further, in May 2008 in a campaign speech, Obama said that Iran, Venezuela and N. Korea were tiny countries who did not pose a serious threat to the U.S. Perhaps Mr. Obama is unaware of Putin's meetings with Chavez to discuss arming them with nuclear weapons or Russia's cooperation with Iran on nuclear weapons as well as other arms.
Obama has gotten the approval of Louis Farrakahn (leader of the Nation of Islam), Momar Kadafi, Hugo Chavez, and Ahmed Yousef (Hamas). Do you think the list above could be why? Collin Powell is in fabulous company, isn't he?
Little commentary is needed on Obama's obvious lack of understanding about the current state of the world and our place in it. It is clear that our a strong military and national defense will not be a priority in an Obama administration. Ronald Reagan understood the deterring effect of a strong military to our enemies. Obama is sending a signal of weakness and appeasment that is extraordinarily dangerous given the nuclear age in which we live. We must understand what is at stake in this election and our national defense tops our list as a reason to support the McCain-Palin ticket!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sj91NH5fvw&feature=related
At the end of this blog will be a link where you can watch Obama confirm the contents of this blog with his own mouth.
In October of 2007, Obama outlined his plan for our National Defense under an Obama administration. Following are the highlights:
1) He will end the war and withdraw troops immediately. (White flag of surrender, anyone?)
2) He will cut "tens of billions of dollars" in what he calls "wasteful" defense spending, including the spending on the Iraq war.
3) He will cut investment in missile defense systems.
4) He will NOT weaponize space (i.e. end spending on Star Wars, which is making great progress).
5) He will slow the development of future combat systems.
6) He will institute an independent defense priorities board to reign in "unnecessary" spending.
7) He will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons.
a. He will not develop new nuclear weapons
b. He will seek a ban on all fissile material
c. He will negotiate with RUSSIA to take our ICBMs off hair trigger alert and to achieve deep
cuts in our nuclear arsenals.
8) His SOLE priority in defense spending will be protecting America.
9) Further, in May 2008 in a campaign speech, Obama said that Iran, Venezuela and N. Korea were tiny countries who did not pose a serious threat to the U.S. Perhaps Mr. Obama is unaware of Putin's meetings with Chavez to discuss arming them with nuclear weapons or Russia's cooperation with Iran on nuclear weapons as well as other arms.
Obama has gotten the approval of Louis Farrakahn (leader of the Nation of Islam), Momar Kadafi, Hugo Chavez, and Ahmed Yousef (Hamas). Do you think the list above could be why? Collin Powell is in fabulous company, isn't he?
Little commentary is needed on Obama's obvious lack of understanding about the current state of the world and our place in it. It is clear that our a strong military and national defense will not be a priority in an Obama administration. Ronald Reagan understood the deterring effect of a strong military to our enemies. Obama is sending a signal of weakness and appeasment that is extraordinarily dangerous given the nuclear age in which we live. We must understand what is at stake in this election and our national defense tops our list as a reason to support the McCain-Palin ticket!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sj91NH5fvw&feature=related
Monday, October 20, 2008
This and That...
The beginning of a new week brings election news headlines that are both encouraging and disturbing.
For starters, it may be disheartening for some readers of this blog that Colin Powell has endorsed Barack Obama. Do not be dismayed--while Colin Powell purports to be a Republican, many of his liberal leanings have been under or unreported by the media. And while he owes much to the true Republicans who were instrumental in elevating him to the position of national prominence he enjoys, he has never born the stripes of a true conservative. Therefore, his endorsement of Obama comes as no surprise to us.
Rush Limbaugh, the well-known commentator, responded to the announcement with these comments in an email according to Politico.com: "Secretary Powell says his endorsement is not about race, OK, fine. I am now researching his past endorsements to see if I can find all the inexperienced, very liberal, white candidates he has endorsed. I'll let you know what I come up with."
Look at it this way if you are worried. Hillary Clinton had the endorsements of Jack Nicholson, Anne Rice, Cher, and O.J. Simpson (oh, we probably should have left the last one out) just to name a few--and she didn't win her party's nomination. Make no mistake, we aren't insinuating that Colin Powell is a Jack Nicholson or Cher equal (take that any way you'd like) but we do point out that it's not very likely that his support will greatly sway or alter this election.
As far as our girl Sarah is concerned, she continues to handle herself with class and dignity in the face of more scrutiny and vitriolic criticism than any Vice Presidential candidate since Dan Quayle.
According to a Washington Post Report, Sarah's appearance on SNL this weekend was a record breaker for the show.
For starters, it may be disheartening for some readers of this blog that Colin Powell has endorsed Barack Obama. Do not be dismayed--while Colin Powell purports to be a Republican, many of his liberal leanings have been under or unreported by the media. And while he owes much to the true Republicans who were instrumental in elevating him to the position of national prominence he enjoys, he has never born the stripes of a true conservative. Therefore, his endorsement of Obama comes as no surprise to us.
Rush Limbaugh, the well-known commentator, responded to the announcement with these comments in an email according to Politico.com: "Secretary Powell says his endorsement is not about race, OK, fine. I am now researching his past endorsements to see if I can find all the inexperienced, very liberal, white candidates he has endorsed. I'll let you know what I come up with."
Look at it this way if you are worried. Hillary Clinton had the endorsements of Jack Nicholson, Anne Rice, Cher, and O.J. Simpson (oh, we probably should have left the last one out) just to name a few--and she didn't win her party's nomination. Make no mistake, we aren't insinuating that Colin Powell is a Jack Nicholson or Cher equal (take that any way you'd like) but we do point out that it's not very likely that his support will greatly sway or alter this election.
As far as our girl Sarah is concerned, she continues to handle herself with class and dignity in the face of more scrutiny and vitriolic criticism than any Vice Presidential candidate since Dan Quayle.
According to a Washington Post Report, Sarah's appearance on SNL this weekend was a record breaker for the show.
"GOP veep candidate Sarah Palin continues to be the ratings magnet of the
TV season, most recently delivering "Saturday Night Live" its best preliminary
ratings in 14 years. It's hard to make predictions on how many viewers
watched Saturday's "SNL" based on overnight ratings in the so-called
"metered markets," but a rough estimate would put it around 14 million
viewers who watched Palin do her drive-by appearance on the NBC late-night
show. It's the top-scoring "SNL" in 56 of the country's top TV markets since
the March 12, 1994, edition, which, ironically, was not one of the show's
politically themed editions. "Here's a look at the SNL segment. For now...we will leave you with this: Way to Go Sarah!
http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/clips/update-palin-rap/773781/
Friday, October 17, 2008
For All Who've Expressed Concern!
Thank you for checking our blog and for asking if we've died or fallen off the face of the earth or have discontinued our support for Mrs. Palin.
Fortunately and thankfully, we are still alive, still VERY supportive of Sarah Palin (and John McCain)-- and more than hopeful that the fate of our nation's future will not fall into the hands of the extreme liberals who will further chip away at every remaining vestige of freedom we hold dear.
So, why have we been quiet? Absent? We've been busy working, teaching, speaking, and working some more in order to pay our already excessive DEMOCRAT party imposed tax burden--a burden that will only increase more under a Democrat administration. And we are not wealthy--people should really read the fine print if they think Obama will be good for their pocket books. Under Obama, the Bush tax cuts will expire, and instantly, every person who works and contributes to society will be saddled with those increases combined with the additional burden of funding Obama's plan to redistribute our "wealth". (Thanks to Joe the Plumber for asking the right question so that Obama spoke from his own mouth about his ultimate intent.)
In conclusion, unless you are a welfare recipient or a dead-beat, get ready for higher taxes if Obama is elected...and if that sounds as bad to you as to us, pray that blind eyes are opened, that ACORN voter fraud ceases, and that those who still believe in individual liberty show up to vote in record numbers!
Fortunately and thankfully, we are still alive, still VERY supportive of Sarah Palin (and John McCain)-- and more than hopeful that the fate of our nation's future will not fall into the hands of the extreme liberals who will further chip away at every remaining vestige of freedom we hold dear.
So, why have we been quiet? Absent? We've been busy working, teaching, speaking, and working some more in order to pay our already excessive DEMOCRAT party imposed tax burden--a burden that will only increase more under a Democrat administration. And we are not wealthy--people should really read the fine print if they think Obama will be good for their pocket books. Under Obama, the Bush tax cuts will expire, and instantly, every person who works and contributes to society will be saddled with those increases combined with the additional burden of funding Obama's plan to redistribute our "wealth". (Thanks to Joe the Plumber for asking the right question so that Obama spoke from his own mouth about his ultimate intent.)
In conclusion, unless you are a welfare recipient or a dead-beat, get ready for higher taxes if Obama is elected...and if that sounds as bad to you as to us, pray that blind eyes are opened, that ACORN voter fraud ceases, and that those who still believe in individual liberty show up to vote in record numbers!
Difficult to Digest...
You've probably heard this, but just in case you haven't, take a listen. We're just wondering how pervasive the ignorance really is out there-- and considering the appeal of Barack Obama, we're thinking this may be more indicative of the rule rather than its exception.
Have we reached the pinnacle of electoral ignorance yet? Without an informed citizenry that is capable of understanding the disastrous ramifications of big government intrusion and its assault on individual liberty, it appears we may be electing an OLD World Order (also known as socialism) under the guise of change here in the "former?" land of the free and home of the brave.
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=194983&comments=1
Have we reached the pinnacle of electoral ignorance yet? Without an informed citizenry that is capable of understanding the disastrous ramifications of big government intrusion and its assault on individual liberty, it appears we may be electing an OLD World Order (also known as socialism) under the guise of change here in the "former?" land of the free and home of the brave.
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=194983&comments=1
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Slam Dunk!
How many of us could possibly digest that much material in less than 5 weeks and then deliver it with so much grace, humor, and spunk? Tonight Gov. Palin absolutely answered whether she is capable of the office for which she has been nominated. She did conservatives, and particularly conservative women, proud!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)